KAEHNI ET AL.

v.

DIFFRACTION CO.

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• Wetzel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 508 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …e employees suspected as most likely to initiate a Title YII suit in the expectation that such employees would thereby be rendered incapable of bringing the suit as a class action. Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F. 2d 721 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854, 94 S.Ct. 153, 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973). In the present case, the district court specifically found that the requirements of Rule 23(a)(4) have been met. The interests of Wetzel and Ross in batting the sexually discriminatory policies of the Company s…
• Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1985)
  …intangible component. See, e. g., United States v. Seagraves, 265 F. 2d 876 (CA3 1959) (geophysical maps identifying possible oil deposits); United States v. Greenwald, 479 F. 2d 320 (CA6) (documents bearing secret chemical formulae), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 854 (1973). But these cases and others prosecuted under § 2314 have always involved physical “goods, wares, [or] merchandise” that have themselves been “stolen, converted or taken by fraud.” This basic element comports with the common-sense meaning of…
• Kaplan v. Int'l Alliance OF Theatrical & Stage Emps. & Motion Picture Mach. Operators OF the United States & Canada, 525 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …unemployment may accumulate during the prosecution of this appeal, as will her attorney’s fees and her costs, the district court reservation of jurisdiction was proper. See Reed v. Arlington Hotel Co., 476 F. 2d 721, 726 (8 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 854, 94 S.Ct. 153, 38 L.Ed.2d 103 (1973); Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Co., 293 F.Supp. 1219, 1227 (C.D.Cal.1968), aff’d 444 F. 2d 1219 (9 Cir. 1971). Affirmed. SNEED, J., concurs in the result. . Once the inference of discrimination arises from pro…