KAISER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Hawthorne v. State, 470 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …f she had called a lawyer before calling an ambulance; and we instruct the prosecution, and the defense, to avoid such prejudicial statements on retrial. See generally United States ex rel. Macon v. Yeager, 476 F. 2d 613 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855, 94 S.Ct. 154, 38 L.Ed.2d 104 (1973); and United States v. McDonald, 620 F. 2d 559 (5th Cir.1980). The next argument by appellant is that the trial court erred in failing to admit the expert testimony of Dr. Lorraine Walker that appellant was a bat…
• United States v. Milan Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …d 76 (1980). We thus consider the specific categories of alleged prosecutorial conduct, mentioned above, as having occurred in the unfortunate context of appellants’ own making. United States v. LaSorsa, 480 F. 2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855, 94 S.Ct. 157, 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).15 The instances where the prosecutor is alleged unfairly to have engaged in name-calling or disparagement of defendants all constitute fair comment. For example, references to appellant Ljubas as a “man of peac…
• United States v. Mallah, 503 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …incomplete answer, the government should have remained silent. Mr. Duke’s point was well taken. Neither can the remark be justified as an instance of fighting fire with fire. United States v. LaSorsa, 480 F. 2d 522, 525-526 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 855, 94 S.Ct. 157, 38 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973). Although Mr. Duke’s summation was in good part accusatory,4 the suggestion of previous convictions reflected on the other defendants as well, and their summations were not so vitriolic. The government would do…