CAINE ET AL.

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Johnson, 516 F.2d 209 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …. Although the doctrine of dual sovereignty has been eroded somewhat in recent years,3 we do not read Ashe, Waller, Benton, or any other Supreme Court case as rejecting Abbate. See Martin v. Rose, 481 F. 2d 658, 659-660 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 876, 94 S.Ct. 86, 38 L.Ed.2d 121 (1973). There is yet another reason defendant’s double jeopardy argument must be rejected. The state offense of kidnapping and the federal offense of extortion are separate crimes requiring proof of different elements b…
• United States v. Brunson, 549 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …the United States by consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of a fort, magazine, arsenal, dockyard, or other needful building. See United States v. Erdos, 474 F. 2d 157, 159-60 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876, 96 S.Ct. 42, 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973); cf. Battle v. United States, 209 U.S. 36, 37, 28 S.Ct. 422, 423, 52 L.Ed. 670 (1908) (holding that federal statute proscribing murder “within any fort, arsenal, dockyard, magazine, or in any other place or distri…
• McKEEL v. The Islamic Republic OF Iran & the United States, 722 F.2d 582 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …bassy is under concurrent jurisdiction of United States criminal laws), rev’d on other grounds sub nom. Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 101 S.Ct. 2766, 69 L.Ed.2d 640 (1980); United States v. Erdos, 474 F. 2d 157, 159-60 (4th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 876, 94 S.Ct. 42, 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973); Rocha, 288 F. 2d at 548-49. Appellants claim that United States v. Erdos establishes that embassies are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States for purposes of the FSIA with the result that jurisdiction…