COCA-COLA CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• State v. Falls Chase Special Taxing Dist., 424 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …ecure redress in a proceeding before the commission, [citations omitted] The District Court properly assumed jurisdiction of this suit, (emphasis supplied) Coca-Cola Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 475 F. 2d 299, 303 (C.A. 5th 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877, 94 S.Ct. 121, 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (1973): The most widely recognized exception to the general rule against judicial consideration of interlocutory agency rulings is the class of cases where an agency has exercised authority in excess of its jurisdictio…
• Shevin v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1976)
  …y have been obliged to reach the merits or, reaching the merits, to grant the “extraordinary remedy of judicial intervention in agency proceedings still in progress.” Coca-Cola Co. v. Federal Trade Com’n, 475 F. 2d 299, 304 (5th Cir.1973) cert. den. 414 U.S. 877, 38 L.Ed.2d 122, 94 S.Ct. 121 (1973).…
• Julander v. Ford Motor Co., 488 F.2d 839 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …and persuasive in the determination of the law of his resident state and his resolution of the matter should not be disturbed by us unless clearly erroneous. Binkley v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co., 471 F. 2d 889 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 877, 94 S.Ct. 130, 38 L.Ed.2d 122 (Oct. 9, 1973), and Vaughn v. Chrysler Corporation, 442 F. 2d 619 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 857, 92 S.Ct. 106, 30 L.Ed.2d 98 (1971). Under the authorities above cited, we defer to the trial court’s deter…