GASKIN ET AL.

v.

TENNESSEE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Armocida, 515 F.2d 29 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …quirement is satisfied if “ on the whole the agents have shown a high regard for the right of privacy and have done all they reasonably could to avoid unnecessary intrusion.” United States v. Tortorello, 480 F. 2d 764, 784 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 886, 94 S.Ct. 63, 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) (emphasis supplied). Thus in certain factual circumstances the interception of all conversations may be found violative of the minimization requirement, e. g., United States v. King, 335 F.Supp. 523, 540 [*43] (S.D…
• Barber v. Ponte, 772 F.2d 982 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …In addition, several members of the Court were in favor of hearing a challenge that women and young adults age 18-30 were systematically and purposefully excluded from grand juries and petit jury venires but the appeal was denied. White v. Georgia, 414 U.S. 886, 890, 94 S.Ct. 222, 224, 38 L.Ed.2d 134 (1973) (Brennan, J., joined by Douglas and Marshall, JJ., dissenting from dismissal of appeal). . The state contends that we should defer to the state court on the issue of (non-)cognizability. It is, however…
• Wansley v. Slayton, 487 F.2d 90 (4th Cir. 1973)
  …353 F.Supp. at 52. . 353 F.Supp. at 53. . 353 F.Supp. at 52, 53. . Cf., White v. State (1973) 230 Ga. 327, 196 S.E. 2d 849, and dissenting opinion of Justice Brennan, certiorari denied (Justice Brennan, Douglas and Marshall dissenting), 10/15/73, 414 U.S. 886, 94 S.Ct. 222, 38 L. Ed.2d 134; Swain v. Alabama (1965) 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759. . The black representation on the list prepared by the petitioner was 12% and the proportion of blacks in the population was 23%.…