AIR TERMINAL CAB, INC., ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc., 547 F.2d 1329 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …ecause of language appears to be clear. Cass v. United States, 417 U.S. 72, 78-79, 94 S.Ct. 2167, 40 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974). The opinion of this court in United States v. United States Steel Corporation, 482 F. 2d 439, 444 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 909, 94 S.Ct. 229, 38 L.Ed.2d 147, suggests a continuum analysis, which proceeds from the premise that “the plainer the language, the more convincing contrary legislative history must be.” . These arguments are considered in parts IV and V of this opin…
• United States Steel Corp. v. Train, 556 F.2d 822 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …the Chief of Engineers anchorage and navigation will not be injured thereby.” In light of this provision, U.S. Steel argued in United States v. United States Steel Corp., 328 F.Supp. 354 (N.D.Ind.1970), affd, 482 F. 2d 439 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 909, 94 S.Ct. 229, 38 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), that the Refuse Act covered only discharges that obstructed navigation or anchorage. After the district court’s adverse decision in that case, and presumably because of it, the company filed its 1971 application…
• Reserve Mining Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency & William D. Ruckelshaus, 514 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …655, 658 & n. 3, 670-72 (1973); United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F. 2d 167, 170 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied,--U.S.--, 95 S.Ct. 1352, 43 L.Ed. 439 (1975); United States v. United States Steel Corp., 482 F. 2d 439, 442 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 909, 94 S.Ct. 229, 38 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). Reserve, however, does have a permit which, it asserts, precludes a finding of a violation of the Refuse Act. The Department of the Army granted this permit in 1948 pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 40373 and it authoriz…

  ← 1 / 2 →