GATEWAY CENTER CORP.

v.

MERRIAM

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …rd of a government contract to a large business, asserted interests protected by the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 631 et seq., and its implementing regulations. The Third Circuit, in Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233, 1242 (3 Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973), stated that the federal procurement statutes protect “not only the Government’s interest in securing advantageous contracts, but also the interests of those responding to the Government’s invitation to do busine…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Control Data Corp. v. Baldrige, 655 F.2d 283 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …icable to the bidder situation and that the Scanwell rationale should be extended beyond its “disappointed bidder” context. We can indulge appellants on neither point. Appellants argue that Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973),14 Constructores Civiles de Centroamerica, S.A. v. Hannah, 459 F. 2d 1183 (D.C. Cir.1972), see note 22 infra, and Ballerina Pen Co. v. Kunzig, 433 F. 2d 1204 (D.C.Cir. 1970), cert. dismissed, 401 U.S. 950, 91 S.C…
• Local 2855 v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …within the zone of interests to be protected,” for three reasons. First, little is gained in the way of analytic clarity by subsuming these inquiries under an analysis of standing, see Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233, 1245 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973) (Adams, J., dissenting sur the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc). Second, decisions of this court have taken an expansive view of the “zone of interest” test, see, e. g. Concerned Residents of Buck Hi…