GOETZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• B.K. Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …rd of a government contract to a large business, asserted interests protected by the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 631 et seq., and its implementing regulations. The Third Circuit, in Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233, 1242 (3 Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973), stated that the federal procurement statutes protect “not only the Government’s interest in securing advantageous contracts, but also the interests of those responding to the Government’s invitation to do busine…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Control Data Corp. v. Baldrige, 655 F.2d 283 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …icable to the bidder situation and that the Scanwell rationale should be extended beyond its “disappointed bidder” context. We can indulge appellants on neither point. Appellants argue that Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973),14 Constructores Civiles de Centroamerica, S.A. v. Hannah, 459 F. 2d 1183 (D.C. Cir.1972), see note 22 infra, and Ballerina Pen Co. v. Kunzig, 433 F. 2d 1204 (D.C.Cir. 1970), cert. dismissed, 401 U.S. 950, 91 S.C…
• Choctaw Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States, 761 F.2d 609 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …overned by statutes and regulations, such as those applicable in this , case, meet this two-fold test. E.g. Kinnett Dairies, Inc. v. Farrow, 580 F. 2d 1260, 1265-66 (5th Cir. 1978); Merriam v. Kunzig, 476 F. 2d 1233, 1242-43 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 911, 94 S.Ct. 233, 38 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973); Aero Corp. v. Department of the Navy, 540 F.Supp. 180, 203 (D.D.C.1982); Black [*616] Hotel Co. v. Froehlke, 351 F.Supp. 956, 958 (D.Okla.1972). The unsuccessful bidder meets the “injury in fact” prong of the t…