AIKENS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• State v. Hetland, 366 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  …Cir. 1972) (guns); United States v. Hernandez, 486 F. 2d 614 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 959, 94 S.Ct. 1488, 39 L.Ed.2d 574 (1974) (unlawful transportation of aliens); United States v. Legato, 480 F. 2d 408 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 979, 94 S.Ct. 295, 38 L.Ed.2d 223 (1973) (bomb at an airport); United States v. Cage, 494 F. 2d 740 (10th Cir. 1973) (gun); United States v. Gorin, 564 F. 2d 159 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1080, 98 S.Ct. 1276, 55 L.Ed.2d 788 (1978) (gun). B…
• Ellis S. Rubin v. State, 490 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …ly essential to the performance of the duties imposed on them by law. Without it they are mere boards of arbitration whose judgments and decrees would be only advisory.’ ” United States v. Dickinson, 465 F. 2d 496, 510 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 979, 94 S.Ct. 270, 38 L.Ed.2d 223 (1973). Our system of justice simply cannot function if individuals — however strong their views — are free to ignore court orders. Therefore, that Rubin may believe that his position is virtuous and his disobedience m…
• United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …he offenses of bookmaking and conspiracy” is a sufficiently particular description of the type of communication sought to be intercepted. See United States v. Ripka, 349 F.Supp. 539, 542 (E.D.Penn.1972), aff'd, 480 F. 2d 918 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 979, 94 S.Ct. 285, 38 L.Ed.2d 223 (1973). The third requirement of particularity requires the specific identification of individuals committing the offense under investigation. The order in this case authorized televised surveillance of “Peter Scott St…