HOLIFIELD
v.
MISSISSIPPI
HOLIFIELD
MISSISSIPPI
414 U.S. 990
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LA Raza Unida v. State OF NEW Mexico, 577 F.2d 677 (10th Cir. 1978)…he request to convene a three-judge court on the ground that La Raza’s claims were “wholly insubstantial” since such claims were foreclosed by the decision in Pirincin v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, 368 F.Supp. 64 (N.D. Ohio), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 990, 94 S.Ct. 345, 38 L.Ed.2d 231 (1973). Thereafter, the district court, dismissed the action for lack of a substantial federal question. La Raza now appeals. The Supreme Court has held that a three-judge court is not required under 28 U.S.C. § 2281 i…