BURNS

v.

UNITED STATES; MCCOLLUM ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; AND JENKINS V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Cohn v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 477 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …minal prosecution, but see Weeks.); State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220, 65 S.W. 2d 943 (1933); In re Hawkins, 17 N.C.App. 378, 194 S.E. 2d 540, 550-51 (1973), cert. denied, 283 N.C. 393, 196 S.E. 2d 275 (1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1001, 94 S.Ct. 355, 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); Vivian v. Examining Board of Architects, 61 Wis.2d 627, 213 N.W. 2d 359, 366-67 (1974). When such a violation is alleged, it is apparent that there need be no rule explicitly proscribing the allegedly improper c…
• DOE v. Hampton, 566 F.2d 265 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …ned the utility of the present system of duplicative judicial review of federal personnel actions, with no perceptible effect. See, e. g., Polcover v. Secretary of Treasury, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 338, 340-343, 477 F. 2d 1223, 1225-28 & n.11 cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1001, 94 S.Ct. 356, 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); Goldwasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222, 224, 417 F. 2d 1169, 1171 n.1 (1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 922, 90 S.Ct. 918, 25 L.Ed.2d 103 (1970); Scott v. Macy, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 93, 96, 402 F. 2d 644, 647 n.6 (1…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hackley v. Roudebush, 520 F.2d 108 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …171 U.S.App.D.C. pp. ---, 520 F. 2d pp. 145-146 infra. . See, e. g., 171 U.S.App.D.C. p. -, 520 F. 2d p. 144 & note 177 infra; cf., e. g., Polcover v. Secretary of the Treasury, 155 U.S.App.D.C. 338, 340-343, 477 F. 2d 1223, 1225-1228, cert. denied 414 U.S. 1001, 94 S.Ct. 356, 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973) (noting the “[d]uplication, delay, expense and despair for the employee-litigant [which is] inherent in such a [double reviewing court] system”; interposition of District Court serves “no viable purpose”). . Eve…