MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
v.
PETERS ET AL.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
PETERS ET AL.
414 U.S. 1002
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Caution
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
City of Los Angeles Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (U.S. 1978)…sation” covered by Title VII. See n. 22, supra. The Department’s pension benefits, and the contributions that maintain them, are “compensation” under Title VII. Cf. Peters v. Missouri-Pacific R. Co., 483 F. 2d 490, 492 n. 3 (CA5 1973), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1002. The Department’s argument is specious because its contribution schedule distinguished only imperfectly between long-lived and short-lived employees, while distinguishing precisely between male and female employees. In contrast, an entirely gender-…
-
United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMANN, 434 U.S. 192 (U.S. 1977)…9 (1971), or that the employer requiring [*209] retirement is “discriminating] against” the retired employee “with respect to . . . [a] condition ... of employment,” see Peters v. Missouri-Pacific R. Co., 483 F. 2d 490, 492 n. 3 (CA5), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1002 (1973); Rosen v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 477 F. 2d 90, 94-95 (CA3 1973); Bartmess v. Drewrys U. S. A., Inc., supra, at 1188-1189.2 Given these constructions of § 703 (a)(1) of the Civil Rights Act and the absence of any indication that…
-
Ariz. Governing Comm. for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Comp. Plans v. Norris, 463 U.S. 1073 (U.S. 1983)…lost because the annuity benefits previously paid them had been calculated on the basis of sex-segregated actuarial tables. Respondent did not appeal this ruling. See Peters v. Missouri-Pacific R. Co., 483 F. 2d 490, 492, n. 3 (CA5), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1002 (1973). See Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U. S. 702, 712, n. 23 (1978). Section 703(h) of Title VII, the so-called Bennett Amendment, provides that Title VII does not prohibit an employer from “differentiat[ing] upon the basis…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence