FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.

v.

BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Hancock v. Dep't OF Corr., 585 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …ive rise to the Department’s liability for negligence, and whether those duties have been breached is ordinarily a question for the jury to decide. Westberry v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 191 So. 2d 613, 615 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So. 2d 811 (Fla.1967); Beebe v. Kaplan, 177 So. 2d 869, 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). Whether the Department’s breach of its duties was a proximate cause of Hancock’s injuries, and whether Hancock’s own actions may have constituted a foreseeable intervening cause li…
• Century Elevator Co. v. Spinos, 652 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …sor who has notice of the carrier’s subrogation claim settles with the employee only at the tort-feasor’s own risk, unless the carrier is notified. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 190 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert, denied, 200 So. 2d 811 (Fla.1967). On General Accident’s motion, the court found that Spinos’ net recovery amounted to 65.11% of the value of her claim, that General Accident therefore was authorized to reduce future medical benefits by 65.11% until General Accident reco…
• Iviricu v. Velasco, 669 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …, 548 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Dearing v. Reese, 519 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Barker v. Osman, 340 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), and cases cited; Westberry v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 191 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So. 2d 811 (Fla.1967).…

Authorities Cited

• Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 190 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)