FITZGERALD

v.

WILLIAMS

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Lektro-Vend Corp. v. The Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …he competitive market, in the absence of unfair, anti-competitive or predatory conduct, is not enough to establish an antitrust violation.” (Footnote omitted.) See Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co., 479 F. 2d 269, 285 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1022, 94 S.Ct. 445, 38 L.Ed.2d 313 (1973) (Court attaches little significance to statement that the other party “had no right in the walnut shell business. This is my domain.”); Dahl, Inc. v. Roy Cooper Co., 448 F. 2d 17, 19 (9th Cir. 1971) (Court charac…
• Coleman Motor Co. v. Chrysler Corp. & Chrysler Motors Corp., 525 F.2d 1338 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …ctor have sufficient market power to come dangerously close to success. Swift & Company v. United States, 196 U.S. 375, 396, 25 S.Ct. 276, 49 L.Ed. 518 (1905); Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Company, 479 F. 2d 269, 284 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1022, 94 S.Ct. 445, 38 L.Ed.2d 313 (1973); Cornwell Quality Tools Co. v. C.T.S. Company, 446 F. 2d 825, 832 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1049, 92 S.Ct. 716, 30 L.Ed.2d 740 (1972). In a case such as this one, definition of the relevant market…
• United States v. Empire GAS Corp., 537 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ent was required to show Empire’s specific intent to monopolize and a dangerous probability of success within a relevant [*299] product and geographic market. Agrashell, Inc. v. Hammons Products Co., 479 F. 2d 269, 284, 286 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1022, 1032, 94 S.Ct. 445, 461, 38 L.Ed.2d 313, 323 (1973). The district court held that the plaintiff failed to prove any element of its case. A. Specific Intent. Specific intent need not be proved when it is alleged and proved that monopolization has…