MATANKY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 (U.S. 1976)
  …he debate does not extend to the situation where the assessment is shown to be naked and without any foundation. The courts then appear to apply the rule of the Taylor case. See United States v. Rexach, 482 F. 2d 10, 16-17, n. 3 (CA1), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1039 (1973); Pizzarello v. United States, 408 F. 2d 579 (CA2), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 986 (1969); Suarez v. Commisioner, 58 T. C. 792, 814-815 (1972). But cf. Compton v. United States, 334 F. 2d 212, 216 (CA4 1964). Certainly, proof that an assessment…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Radetsky, 535 F.2d 556 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …1, 94 S.Ct. 933, 39 L.Ed.2d 120 (1974). We are persuaded to follow the holdings in United States v. Chakmakis, 449 F. 2d 315, 316 (5th Cir.), and United States v. Matanky, 346 F.Supp. 116 (C.D.Cal.), aff’d, 482 F. 2d 1319 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1039, 94 S.Ct. 539, 38 L.Ed.2d 329 (1973), and conclude that prosecution under 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 was not improper. IV The Fifth Amendment self-incrimination objection to admission of exhibits from defendant’s clinic Defendant contends that error occurre…
• United States v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …t is limited to reimbursement of expenditures. See, e. g., United States v. Candella, 487 F. 2d 1223 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977, 94 S.Ct. 1563, 39 L.Ed.2d 872 (1974); United States v. Matanky, 482 F. 2d 1319 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1039, 94 S.Ct. 539, 38 L.Ed.2d 329 (1973); United States v. Waters, 457 F. 2d 805 (3d Cir. 1972); Ebeling v. United States, 248 F. 2d 429 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 907, 78 S.Ct. 334, 2 L.Ed.2d 261 (1957). Furthermore, although this court has ne…