BERNABEI
v.
UNITED STATES; TEXAD, INC. (TEXAD SPECIALTY CO.) V. PARISH OF ST. MARY SALES AND USE TAX DEPT., IN RE HOROWITZ, ARNOLD V. KIRBY ET AL.; DUN LEAVAY V. HALLAHAN ET AL.; SMILGUS V. BERGMAN ET AL.; DUN LEAVAY V. LUTZ APPELLATE PRINTERS, INC.; MENDES V. REA EXPRESS, INC.; SOOTS ET UX. V. CONNER; SAFIR V. BLACKWELL, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR MARITIME AFFAIRS, ET AL.; BEASLEY V. UNITED STATES; FARMER ET VIR V. TOLEDO EDISON CO.; TUBERVILLE V. TEXACO INC. ET AL.
BERNABEI
UNITED STATES; TEXAD, INC. (TEXAD SPECIALTY CO.) V. PARISH OF ST. MARY SALES AND USE TAX DEPT., IN RE HOROWITZ, ARNOLD V. KIRBY ET AL.; DUN LEAVAY V. HALLAHAN ET AL.; SMILGUS V. BERGMAN ET AL.; DUN LEAVAY V. LUTZ APPELLATE PRINTERS, INC.; MENDES V. REA EXPRESS, INC.; SOOTS ET UX. V. CONNER; SAFIR V. BLACKWELL, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR MARITIME AFFAIRS, ET AL.; BEASLEY V. UNITED STATES; FARMER ET VIR V. TOLEDO EDISON CO.; TUBERVILLE V. TEXACO INC. ET AL.
414 U.S. 1052
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Kirk, 362 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)…. 1977); United States v. Wilson, 534 F. 2d 76 (6th Cir. 1976); United States v. Kessler, 530 F. 2d 1246 (5th Cir. 1976); United States v. Beasley, 479 F. 2d 1124 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 414 U.S. 924, 94 S.Ct. 252, 38 L.Ed.2d 158, reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1052, 94 S.Ct. 557, 38 L.Ed.2d 340 (1973); United States v. Broderick, 425 F.Supp. 93 (S.D.Fla.1977). As noted in United States v. Dinitz, supra, 424 U.S. at 611, 96 S.Ct. at 1081: “The Double Jeopardy Clause does protect a defendant against governmenta…
-
United States v. Murray Morris Kessler, 530 F.2d 1246 (5th Cir. 1976)…should not be applied in the instant case because the mistrial below was the product of “prosecutorial overreaching,” citing United States v. Beasley, 479 F. 2d 1124 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 924, 94 S.Ct. 252, 38 L.Ed.2d 158, reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1052, 94 S.Ct. 557, 38 L.Ed.2d 340 (1973); otherwise “a prosecutor would have the option of first trying his case with inadmissible, prejudicial, and irrelevant evidence — that is, committing known error — in hopes of ‘getting away’ with it, with the abi…1 / 2
-
United States v. Opager, 616 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1980)…ll, 163 U.S. 662, 16 S.Ct. 1192, 41 L.Ed. 300 (1896); United States v. Starling, 571 F. 2d 934, 938 (5th Cir. 1978). . United States v. Beasley, 479 F. 2d 1124, 1126 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 924, 94 S.Ct. 252, 38 L.Ed.2d 158, reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1052, 94 S.Ct. 557, 38 L.Ed.2d 340 (1973). . United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 608, 96 S.Ct. 1075, 1080, 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976). . Jenkins was overruled by the Court in United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65, reh. denied,…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence