WHISTENANT

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Worthington, 544 F.2d 1275 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …necessary to justify a warrantless arrest were present here, in view of the “mobility of the [vehicle], the possibility of flight, and subsequent destruction of evidence . . . .” United States v. Troise, 5 Cir. 1973, 483 F. 2d 615, 617, cert. denied 414 U.S. 1066, 94 S.Ct. 574, 38 L.Ed.2d 471. See Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; United States v. Church, 9 Cir. 1973, 490 F. 2d 353, 355, cert. denied 1974, 416 U.S. 983, 94 S.Ct. 2385, 40 L.Ed.2d 760. Observation of th…
• United States v. Rojas, 537 F.2d 216 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …al rule is that striking erroneously admitted evidence and admonishing the jury to disregard it serves to cure the error. United States v. Vosper, supra, 493 F. 2d at 438 & n. 11; United States v. Troise, 483 F. 2d 615, 618 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1066, 94 S.Ct. 574, 38 L.Ed.2d 471 (1973); Conner v. United States, 322 F. 2d 647 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 907, 84 S.Ct. 1167, 12 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964). To require a new trial, the prejudicial effect of improper matter, viewed in the context…
• United States v. Klein, 546 F.2d 1259 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …rawn from the jury with a direction by the court that it be disregarded may not be the basis of reversible error. United States v. Smith, 517 F. 2d 710 (5th Cir. 1975); see, e. g., United States v. Troise, 483 F. 2d 615, 618 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1066, 94 S.Ct. 574, 38 L.Ed.2d 471 (1973); Conner v. United States, 322 F. 2d 647 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 907, 84 S.Ct. 1167, 12 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964). Only in cases where the remark is so highly prejudicial as to be incurable by the trial c…