STOCKMAR
v.
UNITED STATES
STOCKMAR
UNITED STATES
414 U.S. 1071
Supreme Court of the United States (1973)
Caution
Cited by 52 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (52 total)
-
State v. Hughes, 375 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…a formal arrest was not made until a few minutes after initial detention and within the same block, defendants’ vehicle having remained within view of the arresting officer at all times. McNeary v. Stone, 482 F. 2d 804 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071, 94 S.Ct. 584, 38 L.Ed.2d 478 (1973). For the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited, the order suppressing evidence is reversed and remanded. Reversed and remanded.…
-
Sommers v. State, 404 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)…viously the trial court was convinced that without the marijuana being introduced at trial, appellant could not have been convicted of either possession or sale. We are not so sure. See United States v. Jones, 480 F. 2d 954 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071, 94 S.Ct. 582, 38 L.Ed.2d 476 (1973) (possession conviction affirmed where the government circumstantially proved the existence of marijuana without the benefit of any physical evidence); Ewing v. United States, 386 F. 2d 10 (9th Cir.1967), cert. de…
-
Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1978)…arent that the determination was to be made in the district court. Id. at 293.5 The Lipscomb-sans-Brown formulation of Mitchell was later successively adopted by the Tenth Circuit in United States v. Green, 483 F. 2d 469 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071, 94 S.Ct. 583, 38 L.Ed.2d 477 (1973), the First Circuit in United States v. Sawaya, 486 F. 2d 890 (1st Cir. 1973), the Second Circuit in Wilsey v. United States, 496 F. 2d 619 (2d Cir. 1974), and the Third [*1347] Circuit in United States v. Radowit…
Previewing 3 of 52 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence