BAKER ET AL., TRUSTEES

v.

MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I. DU Pont de Nemours & Co. & Alamo Explosives Co., Inc., 750 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …opinion clearly delineates the Graver Tank tripartite test of substantially the same function, way, and result but then, adopting an analysis found in Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 483 F. 2d 858, 870, 177 USPQ 481, 487 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1079, 94 S.Ct. 597, 38 L.Ed.2d 485 (1973), focuses on the “function, purpose, and quality” of the emulsifying agents of Du Pont and the claimed invention. That focus, argues Du Pont, was wrong because it ignored the Graver Tank tripartite test. We disagr…
• Parker v. Motorola, Inc., 524 F.2d 518 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …r their solution in turn upon the result of such factual determinations. Graham, supra; American Seating Co. v. Southeastern Metals Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 756. See Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 5 Cir. 1973, 483 F. 2d 858, 867, cert. denied 414 U.S. 1079, 94 S.Ct. 597, 38 L.Ed.2d 485. We have distinguished between obvious and non-obvious devices on the basis of “whether ‘creative’, as opposed to ‘mechanical’, skills were required to make them.” Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Sherwood Medical, 5 Cir. 19…
• Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH for the Max-Planck-Institut fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak Co., 616 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …in with a general discussion of the chemistry underlying the patents at issue. The basic principles of the relevant organic chemistry were described in considerable detail in Ziegler v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 483 F. 2d 858 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1079, 94 S.Ct. 597, 38 L.Ed.2d 485 (1973). We review them briefly here. The simplest hydrocarbon molecule is a compound of one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms and is commonly known as methane, represented by the chemical symbol CH4. Because the mole…

  ← 1 / 3 →