EISEN

v.

CARLISLE & JACQUELIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Sal Aiuppa, 298 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 1974)
  …sents with opinion in which ADKINS, C. J., concurs. . Miller v. Califorina, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419, 430 (1973). . The U.S. Supreme Court has noted probable jurisdiction in the case of Jenkins v. [*395] Georgia, Case No. 73-557, 414 U.S. 1090, 94 S.Ct. 719, 38 L.Ed.2d 547, involving certain questions as to the constitutional validity of the Georgia statute from which Ch. 73-120 was patterned. . Id. . Buck v. Gibbs, D.C., 34 F.Supp. 510, mod. 313 U.S. 387, 61 S.Ct. 962, 85 L.Ed. 1416 (1…
• Jenkins v. Georgia, 418 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1974)
  …ting Justices, in addition to other disagreements with the court, thought that “Carnal Knowledge” was entitled to the protection of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Appellant then appealed [*157] to this Court and we noted probable jurisdiction, 414 U. S. 1090 (1973). We agree with the Supreme Court of Georgia’s implicit ruling that the Constitution does not require that juries be instructed in state obscenity cases to, apply the standards of a hypothetical statewide community. Miller approved the use of…
• United States v. Cosmo "Gus" Cangiano and Elana Marie Isola, 491 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …rinciples established in cases such as this one be permitted to make substantial encroachment upon freedom of expression or, as I say, its converse, freedom of reception. Only the other day the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Jenkins v. Georgia, 414 U.S. 1090, 94 S.Ct. 719, 38 L.Ed.2d 547 (1973), where a local community—in that case, a town— determined the movie “Carnal Knowledge” to be obscene. There is here so much at stake that it seems to me we must be very careful and very precise, now that a majori…