LIVINGSTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Arnulfo Bocanegra v. State, 303 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
  …was not prejudicial error to the remaining defendants for the jury to be informed that one or more defendants had pled guilty. United States v. Soares, 10th Cir. 1972, 456 F. 2d 431; United States v. Earley, 10th Cir. 1973, 482 F. 2d 53, cert. den. 414 U.S. 1111, 94 S.Ct. 841, 38 L.Ed.2d 738, and cases cited; Cohen v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1969, 418 F. 2d 565, cert. den. 399 U.S. 933, 90 S.Ct. 2269, 26 L.Ed.2d 804. See also discussion in Grisette v. State, Fla.App.1st 1963, 152 So. 2d 498. Affirmed. McNULT…
• Schlesinger v. Councilman, 420 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1975)
  …l filed a petition for a writ of certiorari addressed to the “service-connected” offense issue,6 and noting the existence of conflicts on this issue between the decision below and decisions of the Court of Military Appeals.7 We granted the petition, 414 U. S. 1111 (1973),8 and although normally we do not consider questions raised neither below nor in the petition, see United States v. Richardson, 418 U. S. 166, 206 (1974) (Stewart, J., dissenting), the jurisdictional and equity issues necessarily implicit in…
• Fuller v. Oregon, 417 U.S. 40 (U.S. 1974)
  …App. 152, 504 P. 2d 1393, and the Supreme Court of Oregon subsequently denied Fuller's petition for review. Because of the importance of the question presented and the conflict of opinion on the constitutional issue involved,3 we granted certiorari, 414 U. S. 1111. [*43] I We begin with consideration of the plan and operation of the challenged statute. By force of interpretation of the State’s Constitution and comprehensive legislation, Oregon mandates that every defendant in a criminal case must be assigned…