HOWARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• Zorick v. Tynes, 372 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …yield attorney’s fees. Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1988.5 But assuming that Florida courts have power to entertain section 1983 suits, and to grant attending remedies, see Metropolitan Dade County v. Wolf, 274 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 1116, 94 S.Ct. 849, 38 L.Ed.2d 743, the short answer to Zorick’s claim of a due process violation is that his blindness did not subject him to an irrebuttable presumption of incompetency as a classroom teacher of sighted students;6 he was refused a [*138…
• Anderson v. State, 665 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …SHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . The call had apparently been made by an unidentified neighbor on his way to work. . The case principally relied on by the state is People v. Parra, 30 Cal.App.3d 729, 106 Cal.Rptr. 531 (Cal.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1116, 94 S.Ct. 849, 38 L.Ed.2d 743 (1973). Parra was expressly disapproved in United States v. Bute, 43 F. 3d 531 (10th Cir.1994) and since Parra involved a commercial premises, we do not consider it to be persuasive. . The question of the scope of evid…
• Lloyd v. Page, 474 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …ng from the nature of the particular case.” 93 US, at 136. The issue of whether Florida will exercise concurrent jurisdiction of § 1983 actions has not been directly faced. Metropolitan Dade County v. Wolf, 274 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. den., 414 U.S. 1116, 94 S.Ct. 849, 38 L.Ed.2d 743 (1973), held that a' personnel weight restriction was not discriminatory, without discussing the jurisdictional question. Zorick v. Tynes, 372 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), made reference to jurisdiction over § 1983 a…