KISTER ET AL.

v.

OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. Trs. OF Ind. Univ., 537 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …-type penalty without notice and an opportunity to be heard, [*257] after exhaustion of available administrative remedies, might be successful under sections 1331 or 1983. Compare Kister v. Ohio Bd. of Regents, 365 F.Supp. 27 (S.D.Ohio 1973), aff’d, 414 U.S. 1117, 94 S.Ct. 855, 38 L.Ed.2d 747 (1974); McDonald v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n., 370 F.Supp. 625 (C.D.Cal.1974); Marin v. University of Puerto Rico, 377 F.Supp. 613 (D.Puerto Rico 1974) . The action at bar is not such a case. The district cou…
• Henry v. United States, 590 F.2d 544 (4th Cir. 1978)
  …ng statements admissible in that case. And the ruling in that case is similar in many respects to our own case of United States v. Dowdy (4th Cir. 1973) 479 F. 2d 213, 229-230, cert. denied 414 U.S. 823, 866, 94 S.Ct. 124, 38 L.Ed.2d 56, reh. denied 414 U.S. 1117, 94 S.Ct. 851, 38 L.Ed.2d 744. There the person engaged in a bribery scheme with the defendant turned into an FBI informer. As a result of his association in crime with the defendant, he had established a relationship under which the defendant felt…