OLDEN

v.

MCCARTHY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Lightbourne v. State, 438 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1983)
  …gument is without merit. [*387] The taking into custody, by police, of property of arrested persons for safekeeping does not violate constitutional search and seizure protections. United States v. Gravitt, 484 F. 2d 375 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1135, 94 S.Ct. 879, 38 L.Ed.2d 761 (1974); United States v. Lipscomb, 435 F. 2d 795 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 980, 91 S.Ct. 1213, 28 L.Ed.2d 331 (1971); Delatte v. State, 384 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Furthermore, after a person allow…
• South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1976)
  …search the container to itemize the property to be held by the police. [This reflects] the underlying principle that the fourth amendment proscribes only unreasonable searches.” United States v. Gravitt, 484 F. 2d 375, 378 (CA5 1973), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1135 (1974) (emphasis in original). [*372] (3) The decisions of this Court point unmistakably to the conclusion reached by both federal and state courts that inventories pursuant to standard police procedures are reasonable. In the first such case, Mr.…
• Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1987)
  …tody of any sort of container [such as] an automobile ... it is reasonable to search the container to itemize the property to be held by the police.’ ” 428 U. S., at 371 (quoting United States v. Gravitt, 484 F. 2d 375, 378 (CA5 1973), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1135 (1974)). In arguing that the latter two interests are not implicated here, the dissent overlooks the testimony of the backup officer who conducted the inventory of Bertine’s van. According to the officer, the vehicle inventory procedures of the Bou…