WALDRON
v.
UNITED STATES; GOAD V. ANDERSON, WARDEN; DEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. D-20 OF CADDO COUNTY ET AL. V. PARKER, COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS; HUTUL V. CHICAGO BAR ASSN.; STRUMSKIS V. UNITED STATES; WATSON V. AULT, WARDEN; WILLIAMS V. CALIFORNIA; THIBADOUX V. WARDEN, CLINTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; PALLER V. PALLER; SAYLES V. MCGUIRE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

U.S. | 1974-01-14
Nos. 72-6748; No. 72-6800; No. 73-404; No. 73-418; No. 73-502; No. 73-5151; No. 73-5181; No. 73-5441; No. 73-5474; No. 73-5481
414 U.S. 1147 Supreme Court of the United States (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 718 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
    …nment, Inc. v. Woodruff & Sons, Inc., 491 F. 2d 866 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874, 95 S.Ct. 135, 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974); Strumkis v. U.S., 200 Ct.Cl. 668, 474 F. 2d 623, cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1067, 94 S.Ct. 576, 38 L.Ed.2d 472, reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1147, 94 S.Ct. 902, 39 L.Ed.2d 103 (1974). Therefore, an admission of “claim coverage” is an admission of literal infringement. . The reinstatement of the Hughes counterclaim by the Ninth Circuit Court, and its remand for further proceedings, in no way…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw