WINGO, WARDEN

v.

WEDDING

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Johnson v. State, 516 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  ….Ct. 129, 66 L.Ed.2d 54 (1980); Smiley v. State, 395 So. 2d 235, 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Wilson v. State, 305 So. 2d 50, 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Newton v. State, 272 So. 2d 15, 18 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 278 So. 2d 627 (Fla.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1157, 94 S.Ct. 914, 39 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974); Roach v. State, 241 So. 2d 742, 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). This latter factor distinguishes this case, in our view, from Lane v. State, 459 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) and Bayshore v. State, 437 So. 2d 198 (Fla.…
• Wingo v. Wedding, 418 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1974)
  …d accordingly “vacate[d] the judgment of dismissal and remand [ed] the case with instructions that the [District] Court itself hold an evidentiary hearing on [Wedding’s] constitutional claims.” 483 F. 2d 1131, 1137 (CA6 1973). We granted certiorari, 414 U. S. 1157 (1974). We affirm.4 [*468] II Under our constitutional framework, the “great constitutional privilege” of habeas corpus, Ex parte Bollman 4 Cranch 75, 95 (1807) (Marshall, C. J.), has historically provided “a prompt and efficacious remedy for whate…
• United States v. Phyliss Briscoe, 896 F.2d 1476 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …old that the computer product as well as the input upon which it is based, must be produced at or within a reasonable time after each act or transaction to which it relates." United States v. Russo, 480 F. 2d 1228, 1240 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1157, 94 S.Ct. 915, 39 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974). . Fed.R.Evid. 602 provides: "A witness may not testify to a matter unless evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. Evidence to prove persona…