VROOM

v.

IRWIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Greyhound Corp. v. MT. Hood Stages, Inc., 437 U.S. 322 (U.S. 1978)
  …ion “[i]n general . . . must be limited to a comparison of the two complaints on their face.” Leh v. General Petroleum Corp., 382 U. S. 54, 65 (1965); accord, Luria Steel & Trading Corp. v. Ogden Corp., 484 F. 2d 1016, 1022 (CA3 1973), cert. denied, 414 U. S. 1158 (1974); Rader v. [*332] Balfour, 440 F. 2d 469, 473 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Alpha Chi Omega v. Rader, 404 U. S. 983 (1971). In the ICC proceeding here in question, the United States’ petition for leave to intervene charged Greyhound "with no wr…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. McLERNON, 746 F.2d 1098 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …an inadvertant discovery, and (3) that the evidence of an unlawful act was “immediately apparent” to them. The Coolidge analysis, which has been completely adopted by this Court, see United States v. Gray, 484 F. 2d 352 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1158, 94 S.Ct. 916, 39 L.Ed.2d 110 (1974); United States v. Truitt, 521 F. 2d 1174 (6th Cir.1975), was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 103 S.Ct. 1535, 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). Appellants do not, nor could they successfull…
• Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH for the Max-Planck-Institut fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak Co., 616 F.2d 1315 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ld damages for infringement which occurred prior to the filing of the suit. Advanced Hydraulics, Inc. v. Otis Elevator, 525 F. 2d at 479; American Home Products Corp. v. Lockwood Manufacturing Co., 483 F. 2d 1120, 1122 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1158, 94 S.Ct. 917, 39 L.Ed.2d 110 (1974); Shaffer v. Rector Well Equipment Co., 155 F. 2d at 345. Estoppel, on the other hand, “arises only when one has so acted as to mislead another and the one thus misled has relied upon the action of the inducing p…