HARRIS

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …the scope of his agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship____ . Of course, the district court may exclude persons who attempt to disrupt the trial. See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F. 2d 973, 984 n. 21 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161, 94 S.Ct. 924, 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974). The court also may exclude, if necessary, persons whose behavior might influence the jury. Cf. United States v. Davis, 532 F. 2d 22, 28 (7th Cir.1976) (it was improper for prosecution witness seated at prosecuto…
• Miranda v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 710 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …he proposed sanction in light of the attorneys’ explanation for their conduct; and (3) the facts supporting the sanction will appear in the record, facilitating appellate review. See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F. 2d 973, 983-87 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1161, 94 S.Ct. 924, 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974).12 [¶] In conclusion, we hold that the district court does not have the power to impose monetary sanctions against attorneys without affording them procedural due process as protective as that afforded by Fed.R.…
• United States v. Chokwe Lumumba, 741 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …avoid the potential disruption of the trial and prejudice to the defendant that would have followed from Lumumba’s immediate incarceration, postponed the ultimate disposition. See Weiss v. Burr, 484 F. 2d 973, 982 n. 15 (9th Cir.1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 1161, 94 S.Ct. 924, 39 L.Ed.2d 115 (1974). We turn to consider the law of criminal contempt. Blackstone has set forth the ancient law of contempt as it existed in the common law of England. Whether it was against the courts of justice involving violenc…