B & J MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

SOLAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• MacKey v. Nat'l Football League, 543 F.2d 606 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …nable and therefore illegal without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use. See generally, Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. National BankAmericard Inc., 485 F. 2d 119 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 1417, 39 L.Ed.2d 473 (1974); Kalinowski, The Per Se Doctrine—Am Emerging Philosophy of Antitrust Law, 11 U.C.L.A.L. Rev. 569 (1964). Among the practices which have been deemed to be so pernicious as to be illegal per se are group boycotts…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Armen de Filippo & Sheldon Fleishman t/a A & S v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F.2d 1313 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …n the “group boycott” categorization. The necessity for careful delineation of the boundaries of this per se category was aptly expressed in Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. National Bank Americard, Inc., 485 F. 2d 119, 125 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 1417, 39 L.Ed.2d 473 (1974): The term “group boycott” . is in reality a very broad label for [*1318] divergent types of concerted activity. To outlaw certain types of business conduct merely by attaching the “group boycott” and “per se” l…
• Point Adams Packing Co. v. Astoria Marine Constr. Co., 594 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …t Adams reasons that since there is no duty to inspect, there should be no duty to give notice. This argument is [*766] premised on this court’s decision in United States v. Franklin Steel Products, Inc., 482 F. 2d 400 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 1416, 39 L.Ed.2d 472, which is distinguishable for several reasons. First, the agreement in Franklin Steel provided that despite inspection and acceptance, the seller warranted that the goods would satisfy certain detailed specifications.…