LOUISIANA

v.

NEWMAN

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (U.S. 1975)
  …— A Proposed Modification of the Exclusionary Rule, 71 Dick. L. Rev. 573, 582-583 (1967). See United States v. Owen, 492 F. 2d 1100, 1107 (CA5), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 965 (1974); Hale v. Henderson, 485 F. 2d 266, 267-269 (CA6 1973), cert. denied, 415 U. S. 930 (1974); United States v. Fallon, 457 F. 2d 15, 19-20 (CA10 1972); Leonard v. United States, 391 F. 2d 537, 538 (CA9 1968); Pennsylvania ex rel. Craig v. Maroney, 348 F. 2d 22, 29 (CA3 1965), See United States v. Edmons, 432 F. 2d 577 (CA2 1970). Se…
• Moffett v. Louie L. Wainwright, 512 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …te does not automatically render the previous arrest and detention illegal absent some showing that police officials lacked a good faith belief in the validity of the statute.” . But see Hale v. Henderson, 485 F. 2d 266 (6th Cir. 1973) cert. denied 415 U.S. 930, 94 S.Ct. 1442, 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974) which establishes a very restrictive test as to when statements following an illegal arrest can be used. . See also Allen v. Cupp, 426 F. 2d 756, 759 (9th Cir. 1970); Thompson v. Warden, 413 F. 2d 454, 455 (4th…
• Mitchell v. Rose, 570 F.2d 129 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …roof of past absence of blacks from the foreman position, along with a selection process susceptible to abuse, because the foreman in that case had not been selected in the same manner. Hale v. Henderson, 485 F. 2d 266 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 930, 94 S.Ct. 1442, 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974). Not inconsistent with that opinion, we hold today that where a prima facie case of discrimination in the selection of grand jury foremen has been established, and has not been rebutted, “the conviction cannot s…