CAVER

v.

UNITED STATES; VAN HOOK V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL DIVISION; AND JONES V. ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• Kokoszka v. Belford in Bankruptcy, 417 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1974)
• Saxbe v. Wash. Post Co., 417 U.S. 843 (U.S. 1974)
  …endment’s protection of press freedom. Because of the important constitutional question involved, and because of an apparent conflict in approach to the question between the District of Columbia Circuit and the Ninth Circuit,3 we granted certiorari. 415 U. S. 956 (1974). The policies of the Federal Bureau of Prisons regarding visitations to prison inmates do not differ significantly from the California policies considered in Pell v. Procunier, ante, p. 817. As the Court of Appeals noted, “inmates’ families…
• Cousins v. Wigoda, 419 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1975)
  …ortant question presented whether the Appellate Court was correct in according primacy to state law over the National Political Party’s rules in the determination of the qualifications and eligibility of delegates to the Party’s National Convention. 415 U. S. 956 (1974) ,4 We reverse. [*484] I There is a threshold question to be decided before we discuss the merits of the constitutional issue. During June and July 1972 the District Court for the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals for the District…