MILLER

v.

BROWN ET AL.; HECK'S, INC. V. FOOD STORE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 347, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO; TARLTON V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
  …McDonald v. Tennessee, 431 U. S. 933 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 429 U. S. 1064 (1977); McDonald v. Tennessee, 425 U. S. 955 (1976); McDonald v. Tennessee, 423 U. S. 991 (1975); McDonald v. Tennessee, 416 U. S. 975 (1974); McDonald v. Tennessee, 415 U. S. 961 (1974); McDonald v. Wellons, 414 U. S. 1074 (1973); McDonald v. Metro Traffic and Parking Comm’n, 409 U. S. 1117 (1973); McDonald v. Wellons, 405 U. S. 928 (1972); McDonald v. Metropolitan Traffic and Parking Comm’n, 404 U. S. 843 (1971). In re McD…
• Walker Operating Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 874 F.2d 1320 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …ting authority of the state agencies, the Act [*1326] was intended to provide a powerful regulatory partner, the Federal Power Commission, which could regulate activities where the state bodies could not.” Corporation Comm’n v. Federal Power Comm’n, 415 U.S. 961, 962, 94 S.Ct. 1548, 1548, 39 L.Ed.2d 863 (1974) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting from summary affirmation).2 The NGA delineated specific areas as areas of federal regulation or of state regulation. For example, the transportation or sale of natural gas f…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. v. The R.R. Comm'n OF Tex., 565 F.2d 144 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1977)
  …1999 (daily ed. Feb. 2; 1977). . The cases upon which Lo-Vaca relies, Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. Comm’n of Kansas, 372 U.S. 84, 83 S.Ct. 646, 9 L.Ed.2d 601 (1963) and FPC v. Corp. Comm’n of Oklahoma, 362 F.Supp. 522 (W.D.Okl.), aff’d, 415 U.S. 961, 94 S.Ct. 1548, 39 L.Ed.2d 863 (1974) are distinguishable. The orders in both cases clearly interfered with the comprehensive federal regulatory scheme established in the Natural Gas Act and if allowed to stand would have frustrated the purposes of…