BROWN

v.

HOPPER, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Casimir Staszcuk, 517 F.2d 53 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …2 S.Ct. 1518, 31 L.Ed.2d 802. In this case, however, the government does not contend that the $3,000 payment so depleted the resources of either Allen or Harris. . Compare United States v. Walker, 489 F. 2d 1353, 1357 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 982, 94 S.Ct. 1574, 39 L.Ed.2d 879. . 48 Stat. 979. Moreover, in describing the requisite effect on commerce, § 2 of the 1934 Act broadly referred to activity “in connection with or in relation to any act in any way or in any degree affecting trade or…
• United States v. Calhoun, 510 F.2d 861 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …rule that the required nexus with interstate commerce is [*870] satisfied by proof the received firearm was previously transported in interstate commerce. That proof exists here. United States v. Walker, 489 F. 2d 1353 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 982, 94 S.Ct. 1574, 39 L.Ed.2d 879 (1974); United States v. Brown, 472 F. 2d 1181 (6th Cir. 1973); United States v. Giannoni, 472 F. 2d 136 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 411 U.S. 935, 93 S.Ct. 1911, 36 L.Ed.2d 396 (1973); United States v. Mancino, 474 F. 2d…
• United States v. Kelly, 519 F.2d 251 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …e, after the date of enactment of this Act, any firearm shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both. . This contention is not new. In United States v. Walker, 489 F. 2d 1353 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 982, 94 S.Ct. 1574, 39 L.Ed.2d 879 (1974), Judge Campbell notes in his concurrence: It is difficult to conceive of an instance in which a person charged with possession of a firearm may not also be charged with receiving it. And if all the Government n…