SUSSMAN

v.

BERGER

Citator

Cited By

• E. Shores Sales Co. v. City OF N. Miami Beach, 363 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1978)
  …. Eastern Shores Sales Company, 341 So. 2d 825 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). The Third District reversed the trial court, expressly relying upon the decision of the Fourth District in Watson v. City of Hallandale, 193 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. den. 201 So. 2d 233 (Fla.1967). The factual situation in Watson varies materially from the facts set forth in the body of the opinion under review.1 The Third District’s reliance upon Watson creates a misapplication of law sufficient to vest jurisdiction in this Court…
• Fleischer v. Ivy Faske Fleischer, 586 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …n an authorization by the husband, which places the wife in a position to remarry within the Jewish religion. See Minkin v. Minkin, 180 N.J.Super. 260, 484 A. 2d 665, 667 (1981). In Turner v. Turner, 192 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1967), cert. denied, 201 So. 2d 233 (1967), the third district held that such a provision is unenforceable. On appeal, the husband argues that it is a violation of the First Amendment to enforce this provision. His argument might be entitled to consideration, however, if he had not…
• In re the Est. of Isaac Litzky v. Howard F. Ullman for the Estate of Isaac Litzky, 296 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …s opinion that the law of Florida now provides for only one kind of marriage, one which is entered into by the parties in good faith and in substantial compliance with Chapter 741. Cf. Turner v. Turner, Fla.App.1966, 192 So. 2d 787, cert. den. Fla., 201 So. 2d 233. Therefore, for the reason stated, the judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed.…