BOWLES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Uptain, 531 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …1974), cert. granted, 421 U.S. 1010, 95 S.Ct. 2414, 44 L.Ed.2d 678 (1975); United States v. Hamilton, 492 F. 2d 1110 (5 Cir. 1974); Thomas v. Estelle, 486 F. 2d 224 (5 Cir. 1973); United States v. dements, 484 F. 2d 928 (5 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 991, 94 S.Ct. 1591, 39 L.Ed.2d 888 (1974); United States v. Williams, 435 F. 2d 1001 (5 Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 931, 91 S.Ct. 1532, 28 L.Ed.2d 865 (1971); Juarez-Flores v. United States, 394 F. 2d 161 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 942, 89…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Wilson, 578 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …rthy. The initial decision whether to admit into evidence a recording containing inaudible or unintelligible portions is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. United States v. Clements, 484 F. 2d 928 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 991, 94 S.Ct. 1591, 39 L.Ed.2d 888 (1974); United States v. Avila, 443 F. 2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 944, 92 S.Ct. 295, 30 L.Ed.2d 258 (1971); Johns v. United States, 323 F. 2d 421 (5th Cir. 1963); Addison v. United States, 317 F. 2d 808…
• United States v. Kelly, 707 F.2d 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …Bryant, supra, 439 F. 2d at 647 (emphasis added). We have subsequently held that the government is not required to preserve or produce insignificant or irrelevant evidence. United States v. Bowles, 488 F. 2d 1307, 1313 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 991, 94 S.Ct. 1591, 39 L.Ed.2d 888 (1974). Kelly does not assert that the Abscam operatives deliberately destroyed recordings of the conversations at issue; he merely claims that Weinberg failed to record them. Nothing in the Bryant line of cases sugges…