NICHOLSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Burton A. Librach, 536 F.2d 1228 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …’s life. The thrust of the statement was that the source of those threats was unknown and irrelevant. The government has the right to comment on arguments raised by the defense.6 United States v. Olsen, 487 F. 2d 77, 83 (8th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 993, 94 S.Ct. 1594, 39 L.Ed.2d 890 (1974). Surely, if there was error, the error was not plain error. III. Librach further argues that he was denied due process because of an unreasonable delay between the time of the offense and the filing of the indi…
• United States v. Adcock, 558 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …United States v. Maestas, 554 F. 2d 834 (8th Cir., 1977); United States v. Conley, supra, 523 F. 2d at 654; United States v. Marchildon, 519 F. 2d 337, 346 (8th Cir. 1975); United States v. Olsen, 487 F. 2d 77, 79-80 (8th Cir. 1973) , cert. denied, 415 U.S. 993, 94 S.Ct. 1594, 39 L.Ed.2d 890 (1974). It is also well settled that in a tax case the government may show proof of unreported income in prior years indicating a pattern of understatement of income which is relevant to the issue of willful intent. U…
• United States v. Gocke, 507 F.2d 820 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …, 346. [Footnote omitted; emphasis supplied.] See also United States v. Thompson, 503 F. 2d 1096 (8th Cir. 1974); Sears v. United States, 490 F. 2d 150, 152 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. Olsen, 487 F. 2d 77, 79-80 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 993, 94 S.Ct. 1594, 39 L.Ed.2d 890 (1974); O’Reilly v. United States, 486 F. 2d 208, 211-212 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1043, 94 S.Ct. 546, 38 L.Ed.2d 334 (1973); C. McCormick, Law of Evidence, § 190 (2d ed. 1972). The government offered direct…