CALIFORNIA

v.

PASCHALL

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Rolf v. Blyth, 570 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …h respect to the analogous “controlling persons” liability provision, § 15 of the 1933 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77o. Compare Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F. 2d 1124, 1130 (4th Cir. 1970) (respondeat superior not supplanted by § 15), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 1622, 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974); Armstrong, Jones & Co. v. SEC, 421 F. 2d 359, 362 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 398 U.S. 958, 90 S.Ct. 2172, 26 L.Ed.2d 543 (1970), with Kamen & Co. v. Paul H. Aschker & Co., 382 F. 2d 689, 697 (9th Cir. 196…
• Cook v. Avien, Inc., 573 F.2d 685 (1st Cir. 1978)
  …e diligence arises in a jury case, it is for the jury to decide whether reasonable diligence has been exercised. Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F. 2d 1124, 1131 (4th Cir. 1970), reconsidered after remand, 488 F. 2d 912 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 1622, 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974). . The trial court did not address the limitations period for § 12(2); it erroneously placed the burden of proof with regard to the statutory period solely on defendants. No facts essential to our ruling on the…
• Marbury Mgmt., Inc. v. Kohn, 629 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …effect that the controlling person provisions were intended to expand, rather than restrict, the scope of liability under the securities laws. The Fourth Circuit, in Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton, 422 F. 2d 1124 (4th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 916, 94 S.Ct. 1623, 40 L.Ed.2d 118 (1974), a case brought under § 12(2) of the ’33 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 771(2), held a brokerage house liable “under familiar [agency] principles, for the tortious representations of its agent”; although the partners of the d…