SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GIANT SUPER MARKETS

v.

LOUISIANA MILK COMMISSION; AND LOUISIANA MILK COMMISSION V. SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS GLANT SUPER MARKETS

Citator

Cited By

• Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573 (U.S. 1986)
  …mers in other States surrender whatever competitive advantages they may possess. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U. S. 511, 528 (1935); Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Comm’n, 365 F. Supp. 1144 (MD La. 1973), aff’d, 416 U. S. 922 (1974). Economic protectionism is not limited to attempts to convey advantages on local merchants; it may include attempts to give local consumers an advantage over consumers in other States. See, e. g., New England Power Co. v. New Hampshire, 455…
• Healy v. THE Beer Inst., 491 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1989)
  …cers or consumers in other States surrender whatever competitive advantages they may possess.” 476 U. S., at 580; see also Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Milk Comm’n, 365 F. Supp. 1144, 1152-1156 (MD La. 1973), summarily aff’d, 416 U. S. 922 (1974). After drawing upon Seelig, the Brown-Forman Court also discussed Healy I with approval. There, as we have noted, the Court of Appeals struck down an earlier version of Connecticut’s price-affirmation statute, which was essentially identica…
• Jethro Horn v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., 555 F.2d 270 (10th Cir. 1977)
  …the recognizable class was limited to 10 persons, the class action was upheld. See also Doe v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc., 529 F. 2d 638 (4th Cir. 1975), and Doe v. Flowers, 364 F.Supp. 953 (N.D.W.Va.1973) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 416 U.S. 922, 94 S.Ct. 1921, 40 L.Ed.2d 279 (1974). In these cases it was stated that where the relief sought is in- [*276] junctive and declaratory, even speculative and conclusory representations as to the size of the class are sufficient. Our decision in Tay…