G. I. DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL.

v.

MURPHY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Harper v. Va. Dep't of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86 (U.S. 1993)
  …e purpose of the new rule, the extent of the reliance on the old rule, and the effect on the administration of justice of a retroactive application of the new rule,” Fountain v. Fountain, 214 Va. 347, 348, 200 S. E. 2d 513, 514 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 939 (1974), quoted in 241 Va., at 241, 401 S. E. 2d, at 874 — suggests that the Supreme Court of Virginia has simply incorporated into state law the three-pronged analysis of Chevron Oil, 404 U. S., at 106-107, and [*100] the criminal retroactivity case…
• Ross v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist., 699 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …trial of the case, by the plaintiffs-appellants’ own estimate, would require several years. The allowance of the amendment would undoubtedly prejudice HISD. See Troxel Mfg. Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co., 489 F. 2d 968, 971 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 939, 94 S.Ct. 1942, 40 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974). The plaintiffs-appellants protest that the motion was denied without a hearing. The Local Rules of the Southern District of Texas provide that a hearing will be held on such a motion only if one is requested b…
• Hayes v. NEW England Millwork Distribs., Inc., 602 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …d ignorance or misunderstanding of the law “has been held an insufficient basis for leave to amend.” Goss v. Revlon, Inc., supra, 548 F. 2d at 407; Troxel Manufacturing Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co., 489 F. 2d 968, 970-71 (6th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 939, 94 S.Ct. 1942, 40 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974); Head v. Timken Roller Bearing Co., 486 F. 2d 870, 874-75 (6th Cir. 1973). Furthermore, we cannot accept appellant’s argument that the appellee would suffer no prejudice from the addition of the union as a defe…