SERFASS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• United States v. DOG, 532 F.2d 1182 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …enue did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Rizzo v. United States, 304 F. 2d 810, 817 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 890, 83 S.Ct. 188, 9 L.Ed.2d 123 (1962). See also United States v. Jobe, 487 F. 2d 268, 269 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 1968, 40 L.Ed.2d 305 (1974). Appellant’s contentions with regard to the applicability of collateral estoppel and law of the case principles to the initial transfer of venue to St. Paul are entirely without merit. Collateral estoppel preve…
• United States v. Severo D. Espinosa, 771 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …738 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 832, 95 S.Ct. 56, 42 L.Ed.2d 58 (1974) (length of trial serves to minimize the effect of improper comments made during opening statement); United States v. West, 486 F. 2d 468, 472 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 1968, 40 L.Ed.2d 305 (1974) (summary of expected testimony which was “not emphasized in any particular way, [took] only a few minutes to recite, and [was] sandwiched between a summary of other evidence" did not deprive defendant of his rig…
• United States v. Calabrese, 645 F.2d 1379 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice.” The decision whether to grant a motion for change of venue rests largely in the sound discretion of the trial judge. United States v. Jobe, 487 F. 2d 268, 269-70 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 955, 94 S.Ct. 1968, 40 L.Ed.2d 305 (1974); Wheeler v. United States, 382 F. 2d 998, 1001-02 (10th Cir. 1967). While the factors cited would support the granting of the motion, when weighed in context they do not compel that result. The business enterpr…