ADAMS

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By (66 total)

• Santa FE Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462 (U.S. 1977)
  …rity are entitled to receive the fair value of their shares.2 The facts alleged in the complaint do not constitute “fraud” within the meaning of Rule 10b-5. See also Eason v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 F. 2d 654 (CA7 1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 960. The motivation for the merger is a matter of indifference to the minority stockholders because they retain no interest in the corporation after the merger is consummated.…
• Chiarella v. United States, 445 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1980)
  …her, we have merely held that petitioner’s criminal conviction cannot rest on the theory that he breached a duty he did not owe. I join the Court’s opinion. * See Eason v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 F. 2d 654 (CA7 1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 960. The specific holding in Eason was rejected in Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U. S. 723. However, the limitation on the right to recover pecuniary damages in a private action identified in Blue Chip is not necessarily coextensive with th…
• Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores (W.D. Pa. 1975)
  …istinct situation. In short, I would abandon the Birnbaum doctrine as a rule of decision in favor of a more general test of nexus, just as the Seventh Circuit did in Eason v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 F. 2d 654, 661 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U. S. 960 (1974). I would not worry about any imagined inability of our federal trial and appellate courts to control the flowering of the types of cases that the Court fears might result. Nor would I yet be disturbed about dire consequences that a basically…

  ← 1 / 3 →