EVANGELINE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (48 total)

• United States v. McCONNEY, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …can permissibly be drawn under the most charitable view of the evidence, I fail to see how the legal standard of exigency, or even the legal standard of “mild exigency,” United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F. 2d 4,11 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970, 94 S.Ct. 1993, 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974), can be satisfied without draining the concept of all legal substance and reading the refusal of admittance requirement out of the statute altogether. That Olson believed McConney to be a convicted felon and tha…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Flickinger, 573 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …mstances which justified the failure to obtain an arrest warrant. United States v. McLaughlin, supra, 525 F. 2d 517; United States v. Curran, 498 F. 2d 30 (9th Cir. 1974); United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F. 2d 4 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970, 94 S.Ct. 1993, 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974). We should therefore first determine whether there were any such exigent circumstances. Ordinarily, exigency does not evolve from one single fact. Indeed, we are often confronted with a mosaic — no one part of…
• United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963),2 “[i]t is now clear that, to some extent, [the knock-notice requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3109] have been incorporated into the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Bustamante-Gamez, 488 F. 2d 4, 9 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970, 94 S.Ct. 1993, 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974). We need not reach the question whether meeting the federal standard alone is sufficient, because we conclude that the warrant was properly executed whether tested under the state or federal statutes,3 or under…