HILL

v.

MICHIGAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Uptain, 531 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …or continuance presented to the trial court at the time the [*1286] request is denied. Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 84 S.Ct. 841, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964); United States v. Sahley, supra; McKinney v. Wainwright, 488 F. 2d 28 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 973, 94 S.Ct. 1998, 40 L.Ed.2d 562 (1974). The reasons for a continuance which were timely asserted in this case fall into two categories. First, Uptain through his attorney claimed that the interval between arraignment and trial was insufficient to al…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Carroll, 582 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …85. The reviewing court will especially examine the reasons for continuance given at the time the request is denied. Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 84 S.Ct. 841, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964); McKinney v. Wainwright, 488 F. 2d 28 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 973, 94 S.Ct. 1998, 40 L.Ed.2d 562 (1974). Two grounds were asserted by Carroll to support his motion for continuance: insufficient time for full and adequate preparation of the defense, and a conflict in the commitments of Carroll’s attorney, who was…