LILLY

v.

LILLY

Citator

Cited By

• Am. Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & The United States, 669 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …ing of the need for new service throughout the area is amply supported by precedent.”); National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States, 381 F.Supp. 878, 882 (N.D.Okl.1973) (three judge court), aff’d sub nom. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. United States, 416 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 2377, 40 L.Ed.2d 755 (1974); Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. United States, 314 F.Supp. 197, 202 (D.N.J. 1970) (three-judge court). . In a later section Professor Davis distinguishes four questions: (1) Standing of those who are already pa…
• Commonwealth of Pa. v. Local Union 542, 552 F.2d 498 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …; United States v. Sacher, 343 U.S. 1, 6-7, 72 S.Ct. 451, 96 L.Ed. 717 (1952). . These orders are appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1970). See International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F. 2d 112, 114 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 2378, 40 L.Ed.2d 756 (1974). . The transcript of the proceedings following the recess is reproduced as Appendix A to this opinion. . The district court’s Order, Findings, and Commitment of Contempt, entered 40 minutes after the incident…
• In re Grand Jury Impaneled January 21, 529 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …to coerce compliance with court orders. See, e. g., United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947); International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F. 2d 112 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 2378, 40 L.Ed.2d 756 (1974). In at least one case prior to the enactment of § 1826 a federal court imposed a coercive fine on a witness who failed to appear before a grand jury. United States v. Germann, 370 F. 2d 1019 (2d Cir.), vacated…