INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (U.S. 1976)
  …for the statute. Accordingly, the court enjoined the Secretary from refusing to enroll members of the class and subclass represented by appellees. The Secretary appealed directly to this Court.6 We noted probable jurisdiction. Weinberger v. Diaz, 416 U. S. 980. After hearing argument last Term, we set the case for reargument. 420 U. S. 959. We now consider (1) whether the District Court had jurisdiction over Espinosa’s claim; (2) whether Congress may discriminate in favor of citizens and against aliens in…
• Armstrong v. Clovis McALPIN, 625 F.2d 433 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …hers of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Weight Watchers Int'l., Inc., 455 F. 2d 770, 773 (2d Cir. 1972). It was applied also in International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 480 F. 2d 293, 298 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc) (Mulligan, J.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413, 40 L.Ed.2d 777 (1974). This so-called “public importance” gloss on Cohen, however, has not been applied consistently in this circuit. Thus it has been noted that “many collateral order cases, including recent decisions from the Seco…
• Xerox Corp. v. SCM Corp., 534 F.2d 1031 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …urt, no jurisdictional basis exists for interlocutory review of pretrial discovery orders of the type here presented. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 480 F. 2d 293 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413, 40 L.Ed.2d 777 (1974); American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance Co., 380 F. 2d 277 (2d Cir. 1967); Shattuck (IBM) v. Hoegl (Xerox), 523 F. 2d 509 (2d Cir. 1975). No such showing is made here and Judge Newman und…