CAFERO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for the N. Dist. of Cal., 426 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1976)
  …e jurisdiction of the courts of appeals extends to interlocutory orders. See Metros v. United States District Court for Dist. of Colo., 441 F. 2d 313 (CA10 1971). See United States Board of Parole v. Merhige, 487 F. 2d 25 (CA4 1973), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 918 (1974). Petitioners also assert, citing Ford Co. v. Department of Treasury of Indiana, 323 U. S. 459 (1945), and Edelman v. Jordan, 415.U. S. 651 (1974), that discovery of material which is actually the property of the State or its agencies is limi…
• Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1978)
  …n intercepted, § 2518 (10) requires suppression of only those conversations which were illegally intercepted, not suppression of all the intercepted conversations. See, e. g., United States v. Cox, 462 F. 2d 1293, 1301-1302 (CA8 1972), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 918 (1974); United States v. Sisca, 361 F. Supp. 735, 746-747 [*136] (SDNY 1973), aff’d, 503 F. 2d 1337 (CA2), cert. denied, 419 U. S. 1008 (1974); United States v. Mainello, 345 F. Supp. 863, 874-877 (EDNY 1972); United States v. LaGorga, 336 F. Supp.…
• United States v. Papia, 560 F.2d 827 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …count alone. See, e. g., United States v. Hoffa, 349 F. 2d 20, 41 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d, 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966); United States v. Kohne, 358 F.Supp. 1053, 1059 (W.D.Pa. 1973), aff’d, 485 F. 2d 682 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 918, 94 S.Ct. 2624, 41 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974). Nor do we believe that the effect of the court’s instruction was to tell the jury to consider the extrajudicial statements of Papia’s codefendants against her without any limitation whatsoever. The court simply…