LIROCCHI, DBA CABLE CLIMBERS SALES CO., ET AL.

v.

OHIO HOIST MANUFACTURING CO.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Steaks Unlimited, Inc. v. Deaner, 623 F.2d 264 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …ella v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc., 66 F.R.D. 78 (E.D.N.Y.1975). Cf: Carey v. Hume, 492 F. 2d 631 (D.C.Cir.) (First Amendment provides qualified privilege against civil discovery by libel plaintiff of identity of confidential source), cert. dismissed 417 U.S. 938, 94 S.Ct. 2654, 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Cervantes v. Time, Inc., 464 F. 2d 986 (8th Cir. 1972) (same), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125, 93 S.Ct. 939, 35 L.Ed.2d 257 (1973); Garland v. Torre, 259 F. 2d 545 (2d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 910, 79…
• Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …to permit inspection of the diaries, despite provision in the order for protective features of the type plaintiff now seeks. See Ramsay v. Santa Rosa Med. Center, 498 S.W. 2d 741 (Tex.Civ. App.1973), writ ref. n. r. e. app. dism’d and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 938, 94 S.Ct. 3062, 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974). . The question of possible alternative sanctions was not discussed in the briefs, but we believe that it was adequately considered by the court. In Woodham v. American Cystoscope Co., 335 F. 2d 551, 556-57 (5…
• Reporters Comm. FOR Freedom OF the Press v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 593 F.2d 1030 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …information in face of the more compelling requirement that a grand jury be able to secure factual data relating to its investigation of serious criminal conduct. And in Carey v. Hume, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 365, 369, 492 F. 2d 632, 636, cert. dismissed, 417 U.S. 938, 94 S.Ct. 2654, 41 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), this court, before upholding an order of disclosure in a civil libel suit, adopted as its approach one in which “the court will look to the facts on a case-by-case basis in the course of weighing the need for t…

  ← 1 / 2 →