CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.; ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. ET AL. V. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS ET AL.; AND FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION V. CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Hicks v. State, 359 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …that defendants who were allegedly not served with an inventory were not prejudiced where they eventually received actual notice well in advance of the hearing on the motion to suppress. In U. S. v. Rizzo, 492 F. 2d 443 (CA 2nd 1974), cert. denied 417 U.S. 944, 94 S.Ct. 3069, 41 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974), the court affirmed the admission of wiretap evidence where actual prejudice was not claimed to have resulted from delayed service of inventory, stating: “We believe that the touchstone to the determination whe…
• Hampton v. MOW SUN Wong, 426 U.S. 88 (U.S. 1976)
  …ve jurisdictions.1 Because the policy, the law, and the identity of the parties have changed somewhat since the litigation commenced, [*91] we state the facts in detail before addressing the important question which we granted certiorari to resolve. 417 U. S. 944. I Each of the five plaintiffs was denied federal employment solely because of his or her alienage. They were all Chinese residents of San Francisco and each was qualified for an available job. After performing satisfactory work for the Post Offi…
• United States v. Watson, 594 F.2d 1330 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …our. (II R. 216-17; IV R. 440). Any doubts about Bell’s powers of recall were properly questions for the jury to determine. See United States v. Vento, 533 F. 2d 838, 865 (3d Cir.); United States v. Rizzo, 492 F. 2d 443, 448 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 944, 94 S.Ct. 3069, 41 L.Ed.2d 665. We reject appellant Brown’s argument based on United States v. McKeever, 169 F.Supp. 426 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 271 F. 2d 669 (2d Cir.), that the court improperly gave the authentication question to the j…