TAYLOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ine witnesses at his trial. See Brookhart v. Janis, supra. By stipulating to the admission of evidence, the defendant waives the right to confront the source of the evidence. United States v. Martin, 489 F. 2d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 948, 94 S.Ct. 3073, 41 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974); see Williams v. Oklahoma, 358 U.S. 576, 584, 79 S.Ct. 421, 3 L.Ed.2d 516 (1959); Diaz v. United States, 223 U.S. 442, 451, 32 S.Ct. 250, 56 L.Ed. 500 (1912). The accused also waives his right of confrontation…
• United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …e that our standard on review of a competency question is whether the quality of representation rendered was so low that the trial became a “farce or mockery of justice.” See United States v. Martin, 489 F. 2d 674, 677 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 948, 94 S.Ct. 3073, 41 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974). Assuming that the “farce or mockery” standard is appropriate, appellants urge the reexamination of the test and the substitution of a “normal competence” guideline, citing United States ex rel. Johnson v. Joh…
• United States v. Lemon, 550 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …structions as a whole conveyed the proper standard, United States v. Trejo, 501 F. 2d 138, 140 (9th Cir. 1974), the inclusion of the surplus language is not reversible error. United States v. Martin, 489 F. 2d 674, 677 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 948, 94 S.Ct. 3073, 41 L.Ed.2d 668 (1974).2 SPEEDY TRIAL ACT The Speedy Trial Act requires that a person who is continuously “held in detention solely because [he is] awaiting trial” have his “conditions of release” reviewed by the court if, “through…

  ← 1 / 2 →