RANKIN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By (53 total)

• State v. Hassberger, 350 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1977)
  …975) (current address and place of business); Richardson v. State, 508 S.W. 2d 380 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) (residence, wife’s name, bank, and names and addresses of some of his associates); State v. Berard, 132 Vt. 138, 315 A. 2d 501 (1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 950, 94 S.Ct. 3078, 41 L.Ed.2d 671 (1974) (residence). . Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 156 (1968); United States v. Palermo, 410 F. 2d 468 (7th Cir. 1969); but see United States v. Crovedi, 467 F. 2d 1032 (7th Cir. 1972), ce…
• Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1977)
  …bles, 422 U. S. 225, 238-239 (1975). For this reason, it has long been recognized that “the essence of the Sixth Amendment right is . . . privacy of communication with counsel.” United States v. Rosner, 485 F. 2d 1213, 1224 (CA2 1973), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 950 (1974). See, e. g., Caldwell v. United States, 92 U. S. App. D. C. 355, 205 F. 2d 879 (1953); Coplon v. United States, 89 U. S. App. D. C. 103, 191 F. 2d 749 (1951); Louie Yung v. Coleman, 5 F. Supp. 702, 703 (Idaho 1934); cf., e. g., In re Rider, 5…
• Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …e, and where undue reliance is not placed thereon, verbal explanation or comment is sufficient. See, e. g., United States v. Williams, 499 F. 2d 52, 55 n. 4 (1st Cir. 1974); United States v. Rosner, 485 F. 2d 1213, 1230 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 950, 94 S.Ct. 3080, 41 L.Ed.2d 672-(1974). In Farrow’s case, as has been noted, his version of the facts was presented both in the presentence report and by his counsel at sentencing. There is no basis for presuming that the sentencing judge might have…